![]() ![]() But the mouse is still a makeshift extension of the human being. The mouse is more natural than the keyboard, because of the hand and finger-clicking movement. It's a particularly unnatural construct, in which organization is based on the number of times letters are likely to be used. There is little in human biological or cultural experience that supports use of the keyboard. The keyboard is unnatural user interface it exposes too much complexity. Compare to the human body: The underlying biological mechanisms behind hand movement may be complex, but for most people the complexity is largely hidden. Too many technological devices are too difficult to use because they expose too much complexity. Watch how someone interacts with items for sale-first look, then touch. Hands and fingers are more important because they are active-they're how people tactilely manipulate the world around them. People examine objects they desire as much with their hands as their eyes. Iphone iconical software#Apple products appeal to the eyes through design, whether it's the software GUI or hardware appearance. ![]() Human beings are tool users who experience and manipulate the world through five senses. ![]() Nokia and Research in Motion led the market category eight years ago, but now they're laid waste. Nokia invented the smartphone in 1996, but Apple reinvented it by cleverly incorporating sensors and capacitive touchscreen that made the device responsive-more human-like. This characteristic is what made iPhone matter when launched on June 29, 2007. Apple's design ethic is understated, while minimizing complexity. But there is something more fundamental: Designing tech that is easy to use by making it more an extension of the human being-more part of you. There has been much written about the design ethic in context of products that look good. Oh? You finished Wayne's masterpiece and want more iPhone memories? Then let's start with a reminder about the fundamental design ethic that makes iPhone iconic.Īpple's approach to computer/device design is consistent and pervasive: Humanization of complex technological products. I don't want to take away attention from colleague Wayne Williams' superb recollection " 8 years ago today the iPhone went on sale and changed everything-so why didn't I want one?" Problem: The anniversary is but a day, so I slip this one in hoping to draw attention to his work. “After nearly 30 years and countless projects, I am most proud of the lasting work we have done to create a design team, process and culture at Apple that is without peer,” he said.I debated whether or not to post this observation and do so with trepidation. Ive said in the company’s statement that Apple’s design team will thrive without him. It, too, had a distinctive look, with a sleek shape and “click wheel” for navigating between songs. With a curved shape and bright candy-hued colors, the iMac stood out from competitors’ rectangular boxes in black and grey that dominated market and led to a parade of imitators.Ī few years later he was charged with designing the iPod, which, backed by a large marketing campaign, quickly became a popular new way to listen to music in electronic format before the development of modern smartphones. The iMac desktop computer, which Ive was responsible for designing the look of, helped to revive Apple from near bankruptcy in the 1990s. Ive already has a long list of products that bear his signature and have come to define a generation of electronics and influence countless other industrial designers. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |